Comprehensive functional characterization of a novel ANO6 variant in a new patient with Scott syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Scott syndrome is a mild platelet-type bleeding disorder, first described in 1979, with only 3 unrelated families identified through defective phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure and confirmed by sequencing. The syndrome is distinguished by impaired surface exposure of procoagulant PS on platelets after stimulation. To date, platelet function and thrombin generation in this condition have not been extensively characterized. OBJECTIVES: Genetic and functional studies were undertaken in a consanguineous family with a history of excessive bleeding of unknown cause. METHODS: A targeted gene panel of known bleeding and platelet genes was used to identify possible genetic variants. Platelet phenotyping, flow adhesion, flow cytometry, whole blood and platelet-rich plasma thrombin generation, and specialized extracellular vesicle measurements were performed. RESULTS: We detected a novel homozygous frameshift variant, c.1943del (p.Arg648Hisfs∗23), in ANO6 encoding Anoctamin 6, in a patient with a bleeding history but interestingly with normal ANO6 expression. Phenotyping of the patient's platelets confirmed the absence of PS expression and procoagulant activity but also revealed other defects including reduced platelet δ granules, reduced ristocetin-mediated aggregation and secretion, and reduced P-selectin expression after stimulation. PS was absent on spread platelets, and thrombi formed over collagen at 1500/s. Reduced thrombin generation was observed in platelet-rich plasma and confirmed in whole blood using a new thrombin generation assay. CONCLUSION: We present a comprehensive report of a patient with Scott syndrome with a novel frameshift variant in AN06, which is associated with no platelet PS exposure and markedly reduced thrombin generation in whole blood, explaining the significant bleeding phenotype observed.

PF4 activates the c-Mpl-Jak2 pathway in platelets.

ABSTRACT: Platelet factor 4 (PF4) is an abundant chemokine that is released from platelet α-granules on activation. PF4 is central to the pathophysiology of vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT) in which antibodies to PF4 form immune complexes with PF4, which activate platelets and neutrophils through Fc receptors. In this study, we show that PF4 binds and activates the thrombopoietin receptor, cellular myeloproliferative leukemia protein (c-Mpl), on platelets. This leads to the activation of Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) and phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 3 and STAT5, leading to platelet aggregation. Inhibition of the c-Mpl-JAK2 pathway inhibits platelet aggregation to PF4, VITT sera, and the combination of PF4 and IgG isolated from VITT patient plasma. The results support a model in which PF4-based immune complexes activate platelets through binding of the Fc domain to FcγRIIA and PF4 to c-Mpl.

Trivalent nanobody-based ligands mediate powerful activation of GPVI, CLEC-2, and PEAR1 in human platelets whereas FcγRIIA requires a tetravalent ligand.

BACKGROUND: Clustering of the receptors glycoprotein receptor VI (GPVI), C-type lectin-like receptor 2 (CLEC-2), low-affinity immunoglobulin γ Fc region receptor II-a (FcγRIIA), and platelet endothelial aggregation receptor 1 (PEAR1) leads to powerful activation of platelets through phosphorylation of tyrosine in their cytosolic tails and initiation of downstream signaling cascades. GPVI, CLEC-2, and FcγRIIA signal through YxxL motifs that activate Syk. PEAR1 signals through a YxxM motif that activates phosphoinositide 3-kinase. Current ligands for these receptors have an undefined valency and show significant batch variation and, for some, uncertain specificity. OBJECTIVES: We have raised nanobodies against each of these receptors and multimerized them to identify the minimum number of epitopes to achieve robust activation of human platelets. METHODS: Divalent and trivalent nanobodies were generated using a flexible glycine-serine linker. Tetravalent nanobodies utilize a mouse Fc domain (IgG2a, which does not bind to FcγRIIA) to dimerize the divalent nanobody. Ligand affinity measurements were determined by surface plasmon resonance. Platelet aggregation, adenosine triphosphate secretion, and protein phosphorylation were analyzed using standardized methods. RESULTS: Multimerization of the nanobodies led to a stepwise increase in affinity with divalent and higher-order nanobody oligomers having sub-nanomolar affinity. The trivalent nanobodies to GPVI, CLEC-2, and PEAR1 stimulated powerful and robust platelet aggregation, secretion, and protein phosphorylation at low nanomolar concentrations. A tetravalent nanobody was required to activate FcγRIIA with the concentration-response relationship showing a greater variability and reduced sensitivity compared with the other nanobody-based ligands, despite a sub-nanomolar binding affinity. CONCLUSION: The multivalent nanobodies represent a series of standardized, potent agonists for platelet glycoprotein receptors. They have applications as research tools and in clinical assays.

Divalent nanobodies to platelet CLEC-2 can serve as agonists or antagonists.

CLEC-2 is a target for a new class of antiplatelet agent. Clustering of CLEC-2 leads to phosphorylation of a cytosolic YxxL and binding of the tandem SH2 domains in Syk, crosslinking two receptors. We have raised 48 nanobodies to CLEC-2 and crosslinked the most potent of these to generate divalent and tetravalent nanobody ligands. Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) was used to show that the multivalent nanobodies cluster CLEC-2 in the membrane and that clustering is reduced by inhibition of Syk. Strikingly, the tetravalent nanobody stimulated aggregation of human platelets, whereas the divalent nanobody was an antagonist. In contrast, in human CLEC-2 knock-in mouse platelets, the divalent nanobody stimulated aggregation. Mouse platelets express a higher level of CLEC-2 than human platelets. In line with this, the divalent nanobody was an agonist in high-expressing transfected DT40 cells and an antagonist in low-expressing cells. FCS, stepwise photobleaching and non-detergent membrane extraction show that CLEC-2 is a mixture of monomers and dimers, with the degree of dimerisation increasing with expression thereby favouring crosslinking of CLEC-2 dimers. These results identify ligand valency, receptor expression/dimerisation and Syk as variables that govern activation of CLEC-2 and suggest that divalent ligands should be considered as partial agonists.

Heparin and heparin proteoglycan-mimetics activate platelets via PEAR1 and PI3Kß.

BACKGROUND: Platelet endothelial aggregation receptor 1 (PEAR1) is a single-transmembrane orphan receptor primarily expressed on platelets and endothelial cells. Genetic variants of PEAR1 have repeatedly and independently been identified to be associated with cardiovascular diseases, including coronary artery disease. OBJECTIVES: We have identified sulfated fucoidans and their mimetics as ligands for PEAR1 and proposed that its endogenous ligand is a sulfated proteoglycan. The aim of this study was to test this hypothesis. METHODS: A heparin proteoglycan-mimetic (HPGM) was created by linking unfractionated heparin (UFH) to albumin. The ability of the HPGM, UFH and selectively desulfated heparins to stimulate platelet aggregation and protein phosphorylation was investigated. Nanobodies against the 12th to 13th epidermal growth factor-like repeat of PEAR1 and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) isoform-selective inhibitors were tested for the inhibition of platelet activation. RESULTS: We show that HPGM, heparin conjugated to an albumin protein core, stimulates aggregation and phosphorylation of PEAR1 in washed platelets. Platelet aggregation was abolished by an anti-PEAR1 nanobody, Nb138. UFH stimulated platelet aggregation in washed platelets, but desulfated UFH did not. Furthermore, HPGM, but not UFH, stimulated maximal aggregation in platelet-rich plasma. However, both HPGM and UFH increased integrin αIIbß3 activation in whole blood. By using PI3K isoform-selective inhibitors, we show that PEAR1 activates PI3Kß, leading to Akt phosphorylation. CONCLUSION: Our findings reveal that PEAR1 is a receptor for heparin and HPGM and that PI3Kß is a key signaling molecule downstream of PEAR1 in platelets. These findings may have important implications for our understanding of the role of PEAR1 in cardiovascular disease.

Characterizing the binding of glycoprotein VI with nanobody 35 reveals a novel monomeric structure of glycoprotein VI where the conformation of D1+D2 is independent of dimerization.

BACKGROUND: The platelet-signaling receptor glycoprotein VI (GPVI) is a promising antithrombotic target. We have previously raised a series of high-affinity nanobodies (Nbs) against GPVI and identified Nb2, Nb21, and Nb35 as potent GPVI inhibitors. The Nb2 binding site has been mapped to the D1 domain, which is directly adjacent to the CRP binding site. Ligand-binding complementary determining region 3 has only 15% conservation between all 3 Nbs. OBJECTIVES: To map the binding sites of Nb21 and Nb35 on GPVI. METHODS: We determined the X-ray crystal structure of the D1 and D2 extracellular domains of the GPVI-Nb35 complex. We then looked at the effects of various GPVI mutations on the ability of Nbs to inhibit collagen binding and GPVI signaling using surface binding assays and transfected cell lines. RESULTS: The crystal structure of GPVI bound to Nb35 was solved. GPVI was present as a monomer, and the D1+D2 conformation was comparable to that in the dimeric structure. Arg46, Tyr47, and Ala57 are common residues on GPVI targeted by both Nb2 and Nb35. Mutating Arg46 to an Ala abrogated the ability of Nb2, Nb21, and Nb35 to inhibit collagen-induced GPVI signaling and blocked the binding of all 3 Nbs. In addition, Arg60 was found to reduce Nb21 inhibition but not the inhibition Nb2 or Nb35. CONCLUSIONS: These findings reveal key residues involved in the high-affinity binding of GPVI inhibitors and negate the idea that GPVI dimerization induces a conformational change required for ligand binding.

Experimental validation of computerised models of clustering of platelet glycoprotein receptors that signal via tandem SH2 domain proteins.

The clustering of platelet glycoprotein receptors with cytosolic YxxL and YxxM motifs, including GPVI, CLEC-2 and PEAR1, triggers activation via phosphorylation of the conserved tyrosine residues and recruitment of the tandem SH2 (Src homology 2) domain effector proteins, Syk and PI 3-kinase. We have modelled the clustering of these receptors with monovalent, divalent and tetravalent soluble ligands and with transmembrane ligands based on the law of mass action using ordinary differential equations and agent-based modelling. The models were experimentally evaluated in platelets and transfected cell lines using monovalent and multivalent ligands, including novel nanobody-based divalent and tetravalent ligands, by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Ligand valency, receptor number, receptor dimerisation, receptor phosphorylation and a cytosolic tandem SH2 domain protein act in synergy to drive receptor clustering. Threshold concentrations of a CLEC-2-blocking antibody and Syk inhibitor act in synergy to block platelet aggregation. This offers a strategy for countering the effect of avidity of multivalent ligands and in limiting off-target effects.

Platelet activation by charged ligands and nanoparticles: platelet glycoprotein receptors as pattern recognition receptors.

Charge interactions play a critical role in the activation of the innate immune system by damage- and pathogen-associated molecular pattern receptors. The ability of these receptors to recognize a wide spectrum of ligands through a common mechanism is critical in host defense. In this article, we argue that platelet glycoprotein receptors that signal through conserved tyrosine-based motifs function as pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) for charged endogenous and exogenous ligands, including sulfated polysaccharides, charged proteins and nanoparticles. This is exemplified by GPVI, CLEC-2 and PEAR1 which are activated by a wide spectrum of endogenous and exogenous ligands, including diesel exhaust particles, sulfated polysaccharides and charged surfaces. We propose that this mechanism has evolved to drive rapid activation of platelets at sites of injury, but that under some conditions it can drive occlusive thrombosis, for example, when blood comes into contact with infectious agents or toxins. In this Opinion Article, we discuss mechanisms behind charge-mediated platelet activation and opportunities for designing nanoparticles and related agents such as dendrimers as novel antithrombotics.

The structure of CLEC-2: mechanisms of dimerization and higher-order clustering.

The platelet C-type lectin-like receptor CLEC-2 drives inflammation-driven venous thrombosis in mouse models of thrombo-inflammatory disease with a minimal effect on hemostasis identifying it as a target for a new class of antiplatelet agent. Here, we discuss how the protein structure and dynamic arrangement of CLEC-2 on the platelet membrane helps the receptor, which has a single YxxL motif (known as a hemITAM), to trigger intracellular signaling. CLEC-2 exists as a monomer and homo-dimer within resting platelets and forms higher-order oligomers following ligand activation, a process that is mediated by the multivalent nature of its ligands and the binding of the tandem SH2 domains of Syk to the phosphorylated hemITAM and concomitantly to PIP2 or PIP3 to localize it to the membrane. We propose that a low level of active Syk is present at the membrane in resting platelets due to phosphorylation by Src family kinases and that clustering of receptors disturbs the equilibrium between kinases and phosphatases, triggering phosphorylation of the CLEC-2 hemITAM and recruitment of Syk. Knowledge of the structure of CLEC-2 and the mechanism of platelet activation has important implications for development of therapeutics.

Evidence that GPVI is Expressed as a Mixture of Monomers and Dimers, and that the D2 Domain is not Essential for GPVI Activation.

Collagen has been proposed to bind to a unique epitope in dimeric glycoprotein VI (GPVI) and the number of GPVI dimers has been reported to increase upon platelet activation. However, in contrast, the crystal structure of GPVI in complex with collagen-related peptide (CRP) showed binding distinct from the site of dimerization. Further fibrinogen has been reported to bind to monomeric but not dimeric GPVI. In the present study, we have used the advanced fluorescence microscopy techniques of single-molecule microscopy, fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET), and mutagenesis studies in a transfected cell line model to show that GPVI is expressed as a mixture of monomers and dimers and that dimerization through the D2 domain is not critical for activation. As many of these techniques cannot be applied to platelets to resolve this issue, due to the high density of GPVI and its anucleate nature, we used Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) to show that endogenous GPVI is at least partially expressed as a dimer on resting and activated platelet membranes. We propose that GPVI may be expressed as a monomer on the cell surface and it forms dimers in the membrane through diffusion, giving rise to a mixture of monomers and dimers. We speculate that the formation of dimers facilitates ligand binding through avidity.

Structural characterization of a novel GPVI-nanobody complex reveals a biologically active domain-swapped GPVI dimer.

Glycoprotein VI (GPVI) is the major signaling receptor for collagen on platelets. We have raised 54 nanobodies (Nb), grouped into 33 structural classes based on their complementary determining region 3 loops, against recombinant GPVI-Fc (dimeric GPVI) and have characterized their ability to bind recombinant GPVI, resting and activated platelets, and to inhibit platelet activation by collagen. Nbs from 6 different binding classes showed the strongest binding to recombinant GPVI-Fc, suggesting that there was not a single dominant class. The most potent 3, Nb2, 21, and 35, inhibited collagen-induced platelet aggregation with nanomolar half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values and inhibited platelet aggregation under flow. The binding KD of the most potent Nb, Nb2, against recombinant monomeric and dimeric GPVI was 0.6 and 0.7 nM, respectively. The crystal structure of monomeric GPVI in complex with Nb2 revealed a binding epitope adjacent to the collagen-related peptide (CRP) binding groove within the D1 domain. In addition, a novel conformation of GPVI involving a domain swap between the D2 domains was observed. The domain swap is facilitated by the outward extension of the C-C' loop, which forms the domain swap hinge. The functional significance of this conformation was tested by truncating the hinge region so that the domain swap cannot occur. Nb2 was still able to displace collagen and CRP binding to the mutant, but signaling was abolished in a cell-based NFAT reporter assay. This demonstrates that the C-C' loop region is important for GPVI signaling but not ligand binding and suggests the domain-swapped structure may represent an active GPVI conformation.

GPVI (Glycoprotein VI) Interaction With Fibrinogen Is Mediated by Avidity and the Fibrinogen αC-Region.

OBJECTIVE: GPVI (glycoprotein VI) is a key molecular player in collagen-induced platelet signaling and aggregation. Recent evidence indicates that it also plays important role in platelet aggregation and thrombus growth through interaction with fibrin(ogen). However, there are discrepancies in the literature regarding whether the monomeric or dimeric form of GPVI binds to fibrinogen at high affinity. The mechanisms of interaction are also not clear, including which region of fibrinogen is responsible for GPVI binding. We aimed to gain further understanding of the mechanisms of interaction at molecular level and to identify the regions on fibrinogen important for GPVI binding. Approach and Results: Using multiple surface- and solution-based protein-protein interaction methods, we observe that dimeric GPVI binds to fibrinogen with much higher affinity and has a slower dissociation rate constant than the monomer due to avidity effects. Moreover, our data show that the highest affinity interaction of GPVI is with the αC-region of fibrinogen. We further show that GPVI interacts with immobilized fibrinogen and fibrin variants at a similar level, including a nonpolymerizing fibrin variant, suggesting that GPVI binding is independent of fibrin polymerization. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the above findings, we conclude that the higher affinity of dimeric GPVI over the monomer for fibrinogen interaction is achieved by avidity. The αC-region of fibrinogen appears essential for GPVI binding. We propose that fibrin polymerization into fibers during coagulation will cluster GPVI through its αC-region, leading to downstream signaling, further activation of platelets, and potentially stimulating clot growth. Graphic Abstract: A graphic abstract is available for this article.

Does fibrin(ogen) bind to monomeric or dimeric GPVI, or not at all?

GPVI is the major signalling receptor for collagen on platelets. Dimerization of GPVI is required for collagen binding and initiation of signalling through the associated FcR-γ chain. Recently, fibrin and fibrinogen have been identified as ligands for GPVI and shown to induce signalling in support of thrombus formation and stabilization. Contrasting observations have been reported on whether fibrin binds to monomeric or dimeric GPVI, or to neither form. In this article, we discuss reasons for the contradictory results and how to reconcile these. We conclude that a lack of structural knowledge regarding the GPVI constructs that are being used, along with the use of non-standardized reagents, might be the main cause of the discrepant results. This article aims to highlight some of the key areas that need to be addressed.